![]() Universal health care has been found to correlate with higher life expectancy (Ranhabat et al., 2018). Later, in the cons section, we’ll see that others disagree. Thus, some argue that bureaucracy is lower under a universal healthcare system. Even if the hospitals remain private and only need to bill the government, this will require much less administrative overhead on the providers’ part. Under a universal health care system, there is only one payer with only one set of administrative rules. This increases the cost of health care, but the extra money does not go to providing more or better care. Pro 2: Simplified AdministrationĪs large numbers of health care providers work with large numbers of insurance companies, a very complicated administration needs to be established for this to function. There are also no profits that need to be paid out. This means that logistics can remain internal and pricing structures do not need to factor in business costs. This money is not just limited to overhead but also includes as many profit margins as there are private for-profit companies involved in any project.Ī universal health care system may depend on private companies for parts of its services, but most of it will be managed by the government. The more for-profit organizations that a private or semi-private health care system has involved in it, the more money will be spent in transactions between them. ![]() For example, Galvani and Fitzpatrick (2020) demonstrate that a dollar in the universal model tends to go farther than a dollar in a fully privatized model.Ī more expensive healthcare system is not necessarily a better one. Research into the cost of universal healthcare is inconclusive, but some research demonstrates that costs may be lower under a universal model. ![]() References Pros and Cons of Universal Health Care Pro 1: Lower Health Care Costs Overall ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |